pTTFFamp;qamp;Tamp;Famp;Tamp;Famp;∼qamp;Famp;Tamp;Famp;Tamp;∼pamp;Famp;Famp;Tamp;Tamp;p∧∼qamp;Famp;Tamp;Famp;Famp;∼p∧qamp;Famp;Famp;Tamp;Famp;∼p∧∼qamp;Famp;Famp;Famp;T Using the truth table, we can see that the given statement is equivalent to
(∼p)∨(∼q) .
Alternate Method : The given statement
(p∧(∼q))∨((∼p)∧q)∨((∼p)∧(∼q)) can be simplified using the following steps:
amp;(p∧(∼q))∨((∼p)∧q)∨((∼p)∧(∼q))amp;=(p∧(∼q))∨((∼p)∧(q∨(∼q)))amp;=(p∧(∼q))∨((∼p)∧t)amp;=(p∧(∼q))∨(∼p)amp;=(∼p)∨(p∧(∼q))amp;=(∼p∨p)∧(∼p∨∼q)amp;=t∧(∼p∨∼q)amp;=∼p∨∼q Therefore, the given statement is equivalent to
(∼p)∨(∼q) .